Small group chats can be wonderful. Conversation is authentic, connections are based in substance, and members share personal context.
But group chats with more than 10 people can get out of hand. A central feed becomes overwhelming and mostly irrelevant; sharing turns into broadcasting; and most members neither engage nor contribute. In a word: intimacy fades.
Is it possible for an online community forum to stay intimate as it grows? I’m not aware of any examples. It’d require:
It’d be a place you could share content with the people who care about it, and, conversely, where the only content you receive would be content that you care about.
Picture a social network without a feed: a place where you can record an idea or problem, have it distributed to all and only the individuals who would benefit, and see, immediately, the most relevant thoughts from your peers.
This kind of connection-making portal would make a few things possible:
Up until this decade, the requisite connection-making technology didn’t exist. And traditionally, a venture-backed startup wouldn’t be set up to focus on high-impact communities nor earn their trust.
At Plexus — a venture-backed public benefit corporation, harnessing state-of-art connection-making technology — we’re making this portal. A shared brain for online communities.
Let’s see how we do.
(A first step in Inverting the Internet).